<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Dark Knight – A good, maybe even great movie with some caveats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monkeyseemonkeywrite.com/2008/07/30/the-dark-knight-%e2%80%93-a-good-maybe-even-great-movie-with-some-caveats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monkeyseemonkeywrite.com/2008/07/30/the-dark-knight-%e2%80%93-a-good-maybe-even-great-movie-with-some-caveats/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2011 00:15:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: movie buff</title>
		<link>http://monkeyseemonkeywrite.com/2008/07/30/the-dark-knight-%e2%80%93-a-good-maybe-even-great-movie-with-some-caveats/comment-page-1/#comment-241</link>
		<dc:creator>movie buff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hobensack.wordpress.com/?p=225#comment-241</guid>
		<description>i still wish Katie Holmes had stayed on board as Rachel Dawes for the Dark Knight; it was like the time spent getting familiar with her character in Batman Begins was wasted...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i still wish Katie Holmes had stayed on board as Rachel Dawes for the Dark Knight; it was like the time spent getting familiar with her character in Batman Begins was wasted&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve A</title>
		<link>http://monkeyseemonkeywrite.com/2008/07/30/the-dark-knight-%e2%80%93-a-good-maybe-even-great-movie-with-some-caveats/comment-page-1/#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 13:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hobensack.wordpress.com/?p=225#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised Bill didn&#039;t give a nod for the Imax version; the 20 or so minutes filmed specifically for the Imax screens were stunning and certainly added to the action.

And I hate to say I agree with Bill, but he&#039;s right in all facets in his review EXCEPT the length.  This in no way felt like a 2 and a half hour movie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised Bill didn&#8217;t give a nod for the Imax version; the 20 or so minutes filmed specifically for the Imax screens were stunning and certainly added to the action.</p>
<p>And I hate to say I agree with Bill, but he&#8217;s right in all facets in his review EXCEPT the length.  This in no way felt like a 2 and a half hour movie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

